Jump to content

Talk:Paul Danan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(redacted)

[edit]

someone should remove that obvious b.s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.232.123.107 (talk) 05:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The offensive material has already been removed (and I have deleted the reference to it in the header here). I have also removed another sentence that appeared gratuituous and insufficiently sourced, and frankly the entire article could use some rewriting. Newyorkbrad 01:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Newyorkbrad.
This is an excellent illustration of how and why the BLP policy has failed: the template above states various things which "must" happen, but the history shows that they didn't. I wonder if another policy shouldn't be, if we don't have a certain number (say, three) of respected editors and administrators who sign a pledge to keep any given bio on their watchlists, and uphold WP:BLP within a certain time period, (say, 24 hrs) then the article must be immediately deleted, no matter what its current content.Proabivouac 03:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sun reference

[edit]

I've removed a reference from The Sun which suggests he had sex on Celebrity Love Island with Nikki Ziering. Is this just The Sun being its usual self, or should this be in the article? --h2g2bob (talk) 00:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian suggests he "has managed to pull both a toff called Lady Isabella and a Playboy model called Nikki"; so I'll probably include it somewhere. --h2g2bob (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tabloid, Berliner, now a Broadsheet all agree on this one. --h2g2bob (talk) 00:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Career Change)

[edit]

The latest Popbitch mailout (9th April 2009) apart from referring to the vandalism of this site also refers to Paul Danan quitting acting and becoming a recruitment consultant in Loughton, Essex. I am in two minds whether to post this as it may be true from a verified source or it may be Popbitch trying to get a story accepted as fact and amended to the site. Does anyone have any knowledge of this ? Hoppytroffy (talk) 08:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like a jolly good story but I suspect it is just that Dribblingscribe (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Popbitch is not RS. If you can find anything RS to corroborate what they say then add it. If not, leave it out. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fair comments chaps. Thanks. I did have my doubts too. I will not do anything with it. Hoppytroffy (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]