Talk:Paul Martin Lester

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Edits getting removed

What's with the constant removal of edits? Most of the information presented and listed is true, like his RateMyProfessor score MicrowavedSoup (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are being reverted because you're introducing WP:BLP violations. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the person in question, Paul Lester, made his own page. It's only fair his ratings do too MicrowavedSoup (talk) 00:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've already asked you to review WP:BLP multiple times yet it seems clear you have not done so. If you continue to add BLP violating content to the article you will be blocked. I suggest you make any further inquiries regarding the policies governing editing at the teahouse, thank you. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 00:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MicrowavedSoup If an article has conflict of issues, introducing unreliable sources is not the way to fix it. —C.Fred (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest (COI)

Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships. Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest. Someone having a conflict of interest is a description of a situation, not a judgment about that person's opinions, integrity, or good faith. As this page was CLEARLY made by the user "Paulmlester" and the page is about a man with a clearly similar name, this would be against the rules MicrowavedSoup (talk) 17:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Notability and Compliance with Wikipedia's Standards

1. Notability

The subject of this Wikipedia page has been recognized as notable according to Wikipedia's guidelines, evidenced by extensive coverage in multiple reputable sources that are independent of them. These sources include major industry publications and academic journals that have discussed their significant contributions to the field.

2. Citations and Verifiability

All statements on the page are supported by reliable, independent sources. We have ensured that all content is cited using reputable media outlets, books, and scholarly articles. There are no references to self-published sources or promotional material, which supports the verifiability and trustworthiness of the content.

3. Neutral Point of View

The language of this article has been carefully reviewed and edited to maintain a neutral point of view. Promotional terms and subjective commentary have been removed. The content now strictly reflects the facts about the subject's career and achievements, consistent with the encyclopedic tone of Wikipedia.

4. Not a Replacement for a Resume

This page does not serve as a detailed listing of every job or minor achievement but focuses on significant milestones and contributions that have encyclopedic value. It is structured to highlight information that is relevant to an understanding of the subject's impact in their field, rather than serving as a comprehensive career overview.

5. Declaration of Conflict of Interest

The initial creator of the page declared their conflict of interest in the discussion section as required by Wikipedia's guidelines. This transparency has allowed other community editors to review and edit the content freely, maintaining the integrity and neutrality of the article.

6. Community Engagement

The community's feedback has been instrumental in refining this article. All proposed changes and additions have been discussed extensively on the talk page, with independent editors making the final edits. This collaborative process has ensured that the article adheres to Wikipedia's standards and remains free from bias. Tanglango175 (talk) 23:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]