Talk:Paul S. Walsh

Paul S. Walsh has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 10, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
July 19, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed
May 21, 2013	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Paul S. Walsh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 12:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I cleaned up the references. Some small fixes need to be made before I resume:
~~External links: "Independent article September 2005" is dead~~
I removed it as I was unable to find an archive.--GoP _T ^C _N 09:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~How reliable is ref 24?--GoP _T ^C _N 11:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)~~[reply]
I removed the references as the prior reference contains that information.--GoP _T ^C _N 09:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~The title in ref 4 is missing. As I don't have access to The Times you have to edit it.--GoP _T ^C _N 11:55, 8 May 2012 (UTC)~~[reply]
Ok, fixed.--GoP _T ^C _N 09:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Not sure if the mention of his favourite beer is not trivial, but I skip it
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Proposed deletion of File:PSWsignature.jpg

The file File:PSWsignature.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Paul S. Walsh which fails WP:NFCC#8. Walsh doesn't seem to be particularly noted for having some kind of unique or artistic signature and there's no sourced critical commentary about his signature anywhere in the article about him. So, it's unclear how seeing this signature significantly improves the reader's understanding of Walsh to the degree that not seeing the signature would be detrimental to that understanding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]