Talk:Pauropoda
Appearance
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Blind?
[edit]The article says both that pauropods are blind, and that they are "shy of light". It can't really be both, can it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlFink (talk • contribs) 14:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Which names of orders?
[edit]The lead paragraph and taxobox are not consistent with the text with respect to the order-level circumscription of the class. Pauropodina or Hexamerocerata & Tetramerocerata? The latter two are what Ruggiero et al use, which seems like a good default choice. DCDuring (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- As Col, Tol, and Wikispecies uses the latter, I am changing the lead. Stikkyy (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, Stikkyy. For reference, the most recent and authoritative taxonomic sources are probably found in the following:
- Scheller, Ulf (2008). "A reclassification of the Pauropoda (Myriapoda)". International Journal of Myriapodology. 1 (1): 1–38. doi:10.1163/187525408X316730.
- Scheller, Ulf (2011). "Pauropoda". In Minelli, Alessandro (ed.). Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda. Vol. 1. Brill. ISBN 90-04-15611-9.
- Minelli, Alessandro (2011). "Class Chilopoda, Class Symphyla and Class Pauropoda. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness" (PDF). Zootaxa. 3148: 157–158. (an outline).
Categories:
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class Arthropods articles
- Mid-importance Arthropods articles
- WikiProject Arthropods articles