Talk:Peter Carew

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Primary topic?

Hi @Jolly Janner: and @Lobsterthermidor:. I started fixing the links to the Peter Carew dab page, allowing me to find out all of them were referring to the 1575 character, and not the 1580 one. The article on the former also clearly indicates he's considerably more important than the latter. It therefore seems reasonable to me that the 1575 person would be set up as the primary topic. Any objections? --Midas02 (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems fine by me. I'm not familiar with these topics, but thought that Lobster's move was an attempt at disambiguating the two. I forgot to cleanup the incoming links with the dab creation, but then realised it might be the primary topic myself when I released all the incoming links from the bot! Jolly Ω Janner 03:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objection, good work!(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 11:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC))[reply]