Talk:Peter Stas
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Edit request
[edit]Per discussion Stesmo [1], somebody, please add following to my page:
In 2015, Peter Stas created the Horological Smartwatch, characterised by the fact that it is based around a dial rather than a screen. Powered by MotionX of Fullpower Technologies, the watches connect to an app on Android or iOS phone, allowing to track activity, measure sleep cycles, and get reminders to be more active if sitting too long. Activity and sleep quality can be seen on a secondary analog dial on the watch face itself. [1][2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcstas (talk • contribs) 08:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ "The Swiss Have Finally Started Making Luxury Smartwatches". Bloomberg. February 27, 2015. Retrieved March 25, 2015.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ "Frédérique Constant The horological smartwatch is here!". Worldtempus. February 27, 2015. Retrieved March 25, 2015.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help)
Done
- I basically added the suggested information, while trying to rephrase it in a more neutral tone and omit unnecessary detail. I've noticed some related edits of other articles, and I may take an interest in those as well. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2015 (UTC)