Talk:Peterson Pipes
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]To preempt copywrite concerns, I hold copywrite to this [[1]], from which I borrowed liberally (why write it twice?).
Do you also hold copyright on that picture of the cutaway pipe? I'd like to see it in the article. Frotz661 05:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Yes, please feel free to add it. I guess the cutaway belonged to Peterson or the US distributor, but I took the photo a few years ago. 24.172.54.218 21:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Would a link to the Peterson Article on Pipedia be appropriate in the External Links section of this article? Pipedia is an open wiki, but it has been stable for some time. The Peterson Article is extensive. It is primarily from a single source, but one who has an extensive Peterson collection and does a great deal of credible research. --Sethile (talk) 18:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, in doing some research on the external link policy I have answered my own question... As I am the owner of Pipedia I could be construed as having a conflict of interest.
Official websites for Peterson Pipes are www.peterson.com (US) and www.peterson.ie (which is better.) The given link in the article doesn't work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.56.123.17 (talk) 14:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- Start-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles