Talk:Pippinids
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title change
[edit]This entry is called "Pippinids" but it talks about "Pippinids and Arnulfings" which are also listed in the box on the right. Therefore this article should be called "Pippinids and Arnulfings" or be split into "Pippinids" and "Arnulfings".
ICE77 (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. Str1977 (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Although some scholars make a distinction, not all do. A perusal of the literature shows clearly that "Pippinids" is often used for Pippin II and his descendants. I don't think splitting the article makes sense. It will lead to too much confusion. Better to deal with the terminology in one place. Srnec (talk) 15:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Should the name be changed to Pepinids seeing as Pippen is the German version of the Frankish name Pepin. Netanyahuserious (talk) 03:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, both Pippin and Pepin are valid. In any case, the Frankish language was Germanic and closer to German than French. Wikipedia should be consistent within articles but not enforce consistency across articles, as per the usual way of handling legitimate spelling variants. Srnec (talk) 15:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- Stub-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages