Jump to content

Talk:Polikarpov I-185/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Article is well written and complies to WP:MOS requirements.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Article is properly references with reliable sources and has no WP:OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Article covers major aspects and is focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Articles complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Picture is correctly tagged.
  7. Overall: I have not found any issues with this article and am confident that it meets all the requirements for a GA, so I am hapy to pass it. Good job. – SMasters (talk) 09:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail: