Talk:Postlethwaite & Netterville

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States: Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Wikipedians in Louisiana may be able to help!

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page has just been created and is in the process of becoming more informative about Postlethwaite & Netterville, APAC. The company has a very rich history of 60 years and several professional affiliations that already have pages and will be linked in this article. The purpose of this article is to explain the work P&N does, what P&N is, and what affiliations it has. It is not meant to bring in clients. I promise I will work on the tone and content of this page to reflect that. Please don;t delete it! Pncpa (talk) 21:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)P&N page creator[reply]

Edit content after CSD notice

no references or other external links provided. article started as pure promotional, with "us" language changed to "they". whole article was also written as a change to a wikipedia:layout page (see user contribs). unless references showing notability are provided, this article should be deleted per nom. probable COI, as user name is likely abbreviation for company name + CPA. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I edited out what i believe is nonnotable information on this subject. to my understanding, notability would have to be based on third party, nontrivial mention of this info, or a self reported, uncontroversial fact that is unusual for the subject involved. the material i removed was the kind of stuff youd expect any accounting firm of its size to be doing, and the info is readily available on their website. if anything i removed can be sourced to reliable third parties in a nontrivial (not just a casual mention, but an article or review of some length), please put it back with my acceptance. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Partners list

Way too much and probably not up to date. Should only be the main principals or the ones that are notable for inclusion for themselves.--WatchingContent (talk) 19:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]