Jump to content

Talk:Priyanka Chopra/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vensatry (talk · contribs) 05:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although the article looks pretty good, it is a long way from the GA status. There are some serious sourcing issues such as reliability of sourced used, WP:V, bare references, etc.,

Prose
  • WP:LEAD should summarize the whole article. It doesn't talk about her modeling career
  • "Early life" section is too small and is inadequately sourced
  • Brian Kennedy - dab
  • There are a few MOS issues such as usage of italics, TOI, HT and WatchTime needs to be italicised
  • Nothing more is mentioned about her modeling assignments which forms a vital part of her career, rather most of the article talks about her acting career and Music career.
  • "Southern superstar" is superfluous
  • Released dates for her films in the table is not encouraged per MOS
  • No need to mention "Double role" in the notes column
Unsourced statements
  • "Chopra also sang playback in the film, singing "Ullathai Killadhe" along with Vijay"
  • "earning her a Filmfare Best Female Debut Award and a nomination for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award"
  • "She earned a Filmfare Best Villain Award, becoming the second and last female actor to win the award after Kajol (the category has been retired since 2008). She also received a second nomination for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award for the role"
  • The third para of "Initial success and professional setbacks" contains just a single source
  • "Big Brother, also underperformed at the box-office"
  • "She has also signed Apoorva Lakhia's Zanjeer opposite southern superstar Ram Charan Teja who is making his Bollywood debut. It is a remake of the Hindi 1973 film of the same name"
  • The second and third paras of her Music career relies on a single source
  • "When Chopra won the Miss World crown, she became the fifth Indian woman to win the title, and the fourth Indian woman to win in a span of seven years"
Referencing
  • "priyankachopra.org" looks like a fan site
  • Refs #1, #83, #84, #103, #107, #121 and #123 are dead
  • Refs #7, #12, #20, #22 are rd
  • Most of the "bollywoodhungama" links appear to be dead
  • What makes "liveindia.com", "IndiaGlitz" , "filmicafe", "Movie Talkies", "Entertainment.in.msn.com", "Redhotcurry.com" and "Now Running" reliable
  • Refs #52, #60 are missing publisher/work parameter
  • Most of the Refs starting from #64 to #78 are incomplete
  • Inconsistent format in sourcing
  • Refs #112-#115, #118-#120, #126 use just bare URLS

Check against the GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This article has a lot of potential of becoming close to GA material in the near future, but certainly not at this satge. Considering the fact that the nominator is inexperienced and not a major contributor atleast to this article, I don't think the issues can very well be handled with in the hold period. Henceforth, I am quick-failing this. I suggest the nominator to consult the regular contributors and go for a peer review before going in for a second nomination. Vensatry (Ping me) 05:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]