Talk:Priyanka Chopra/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Vensatry (talk · contribs) 05:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Although the article looks pretty good, it is a long way from the GA status. There are some serious sourcing issues such as reliability of sourced used, WP:V, bare references, etc.,
- Prose
- WP:LEAD should summarize the whole article. It doesn't talk about her modeling career
- "Early life" section is too small and is inadequately sourced
- Brian Kennedy - dab
- There are a few MOS issues such as usage of italics, TOI, HT and WatchTime needs to be italicised
- Nothing more is mentioned about her modeling assignments which forms a vital part of her career, rather most of the article talks about her acting career and Music career.
- "Southern superstar" is superfluous
- Released dates for her films in the table is not encouraged per MOS
- No need to mention "Double role" in the notes column
- Unsourced statements
- "Chopra also sang playback in the film, singing "Ullathai Killadhe" along with Vijay"
- "earning her a Filmfare Best Female Debut Award and a nomination for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award"
- "She earned a Filmfare Best Villain Award, becoming the second and last female actor to win the award after Kajol (the category has been retired since 2008). She also received a second nomination for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award for the role"
- The third para of "Initial success and professional setbacks" contains just a single source
- "Big Brother, also underperformed at the box-office"
- "She has also signed Apoorva Lakhia's Zanjeer opposite southern superstar Ram Charan Teja who is making his Bollywood debut. It is a remake of the Hindi 1973 film of the same name"
- The second and third paras of her Music career relies on a single source
- "When Chopra won the Miss World crown, she became the fifth Indian woman to win the title, and the fourth Indian woman to win in a span of seven years"
- Referencing
- "priyankachopra.org" looks like a fan site
- Refs #1, #83, #84, #103, #107, #121 and #123 are dead
- Refs #7, #12, #20, #22 are rd
- Most of the "bollywoodhungama" links appear to be dead
- What makes "liveindia.com", "IndiaGlitz" , "filmicafe", "Movie Talkies", "Entertainment.in.msn.com", "Redhotcurry.com" and "Now Running" reliable
- Refs #52, #60 are missing publisher/work parameter
- Most of the Refs starting from #64 to #78 are incomplete
- Inconsistent format in sourcing
- Refs #112-#115, #118-#120, #126 use just bare URLS
Check against the GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This article has a lot of potential of becoming close to GA material in the near future, but certainly not at this satge. Considering the fact that the nominator is inexperienced and not a major contributor atleast to this article, I don't think the issues can very well be handled with in the hold period. Henceforth, I am quick-failing this. I suggest the nominator to consult the regular contributors and go for a peer review before going in for a second nomination. —Vensatry (Ping me) 05:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)