Jump to content

Talk:Process mining

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible Connected Contributor

[edit]

User:Wvdaalast created the article Process mining and is likely the author of a book that was referred to in the text of the article. For this reason, I removed the book promotion phrase from the article (" See the book Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes by Wil van der Aalst for details.") and am adding the Connected Contributor warning here. Laatu (talk) 14:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Process mining. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Software for process mining" list as spam-magnet

[edit]

These are virtually all companies/products cited to themselves. This seems non-compliant with the WP:NOTDIR policy. I propose we follow the standard of other articles, such as limiting the list scope to "notable" ones (standard WP:GNG defintion as demonstrated by bluelink to article) or being mentioned in secondary sources (standard WP:RS definition as demonstrated by a cited independent ref--this could lead to net WP improvement of added bluelink articles). DMacks (talk) 16:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]