Talk:Propaganda in Cuba
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 September 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
Radio broadcast
[edit]The picture captioned "Radio broadcast" says the device that is a receiver. How can a receiver broadcast? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 7 December 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Cuban revolutionary propaganda → Propaganda in Cuba – Propaganda in Foo country rather than Fooian propaganda is the standard name for articles in Category:Propaganda by country. This is the only odd duck in that category tree. Now, granted, this article focuses on propaganda in Cuba from the revolutionary times onward, but when most people think "Propaganda in Cuba", they reasonably think of the communist/Castro regimes, not of the now-mostly-forgotten pre-Castro government. I think this article would be much better as Propaganda in Cuba, and if someone wants I am sure it can have the lead slightly changed and a section on pre-revolutionary propaganda added eventually. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. RGloucester — ☎ 17:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. If there is any contention that the governments led by Batista and other predecessors of Castro also engaged in propaganda, such properly-sourced supportive detail may likewise become a part of this article. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support per requester. Reidgreg (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Sources
[edit]There's something weird with the sources on this article. Outside of 3 books its the same thing source multiple times, claiming its citing a restricted CIA report? Grassfedbovine (talk) 22:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)