Talk:Prospect Park, Reading

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Berkshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is Prospect Park in Tilehurst?

The article currently says it is.

The definition of Tilehurst according to its article is that it covers the Reading borough wards of Tilehurst, Kentwood and Norcot, plus the West Berkshire wards of Birch Copse and Westwood. And Prospect Park is actually in Reading's Southcote ward. So from a slightly pedantic point of view, we need to change one or other article.

My opinion is that the Park is rather too large to happily sit in any of Reading' suburbs. Rather it is an area in its own right, and forms the boundaries between several suburbs (Tilehust, Southcote, Inner West Reading(?)).

My opinion obviously isn't citable, so I think the safest thing to do is to remove Tilehurst, and simply say something anodyne like the western suburbs of Reading. I will change for now. -- Chris j wood (talk) 14:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mary-Ann Leneghan deletion by Chris J Wood

Chris j wood claims this is "factually inaccurate":

A drug gang from Reading's immigrant community, four on probation and one an illegal alien, abducted the 16 year old schoolgirl and an unnamed 18 year old female. They were scalded, raped, beaten, and tortured for hours. Mary-Ann was stabbed to death. Her friend survived being shot in the head.

Clearly, he knows something the British police don't. And since this is a murder case, I think he should tell us, & them, what did happen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.69 (talk) 04:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the word "horrific" from the sentence "The park hit national headlines in May 2005, when it was the scene of the horrific murder of Mary Ann Leneghan", as per Wikipedia:NPOV. Booglamay (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These crimes used to have a Wikipedia page, Murder of Mary Ann Leneghan; why was it deleted? Because it is an embarrassment to the authorities that they didn't prevent it? It definitely happened, it is notable, the facts are verifiable, all six definitely did it and were convicted and imprisoned. An encyclopedia that has over two-and-two-thirds million articles should definitely have an article on this - many less severe and less notable crimes currently have Wikipedia articles. Providing the anonymity of the surviving victim is not violated, I cannot see any legal problems. F W Nietzsche (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Plenty of stuff to use at [1] . matt (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prospect Park, Reading. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110803200022/http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/parksandopenspaces/prospectpark/ to http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/parksandopenspaces/prospectpark/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]