Talk:Proven (company)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Wikipedia states that "an organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it."

Proven has received coverage from the San Jose Mercury News, Forbes, and TechCrunch. These are just the references mentioned in the article. I purposely left out coverage from CNN, Business Insider, and others because I thought that would seem too much like a lack of neutrality.

Is there advice on how to submit a page for Proven without it being deleted? Is it just not popular enough yet? I really tried to follow all the submission guidelines.

Thanks for your help,

Matt

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I have removed the one reference that was not in line with the guidelines, replacing it with two credible outside references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattseacino (talk • contribs) 18:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]