Talk:Psephophorus

A fact from Psephophorus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,200 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the extinct sea turtle Psephophorus was once mistaken as an ancient armadillo due to the specimen's poor condition?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/July.

Wikipedia

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 27 June 2008 by reviewer Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs).

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turtles (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turtles, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TurtlesWikipedia:WikiProject TurtlesTemplate:WikiProject TurtlesTurtles articles

Comments

"develop some fragments of bones". This is too opaque to edit. In what sense of "develop"?--Wetman (talk) 04:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, so this question has been here unanswered by its author for almost 30 days. Probably simply copied from the source without any understanding. I'll just delete it. --Blechnic (talk) 01:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK hook

The DYK hook that this talk page mentions is about "that the extinct sea turtle Psephophorus was once mistaken as an ancient armadillo due to the specimen's poor condition?" Where is this from? Why was it deleted from the article? I suppose it's just trivia. --Blechnic (talk) 01:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New source reference

species of the fossil turtle Psephophorus terrypratchetti. (1995)

A new species of the fossil turtle Psephophorus (Order Testudines) from the Eocene of the South Island, New Zealand. (named after Terry Pratchett)

Etymology: In honour of the British novelist Terry Pratchett, whose wonderful style and great sense of humour, combined with his deep affection for turtles, merits the naming of this new species after him.

http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/site/publish/journals/jrsnz/1995/44.aspx

http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/includes/download.aspx?ID=85093

Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand abstracts

A new species of the fossil turtle Psephophorus (Order Testudines) from the Eocene of the South Island, New Zealand. R. Köhler * Until now the genus Psephophorus has been known only from Tertiary sediments in Europe, Egypt and the United States. Five specimens from mid Eocene sediments near Waimate (South Canterbury) and one specimen from near Dunedin (Otago) comprise the only such records for the Southern Hemisphere, and are also among the oldest records worldwide. The differences between the New Zealand material and described species of Psephophorus are justification for the naming of the new species, Psephophorus terrypratchetti. Keywords: Order Testudines, Family Dermochelyidae, Southern Hemisphere, New Zealand, Eocene.

(c) Journal of The Royal Society of New Zealand,

Volume 25, Number 3, September 1995, pp 371-384 --Ripvanwinkle111 164.156.231.55 (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to Merge. NukeofEarl (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest the article on P. terrypratchetti be merged into this article in the species section. There is very little different between the two articles at this point.--Kev min § 15:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. It is [[standard convention (although not mandatory) to merge extinct species stubs to the genus article unless or until the individual species have been developed enough to warrant a split. Stegosaurus, one of the most well-known fossil genera, easily accompanies all species in a single article.--Animalparty-- (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. For reasons given above. Faendalimas ^talk 10:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Of course. FunkMonk (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Psephophorus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:65arLJPxsl8J:www.sharktoothhill.com/sharktooth_hill_fauna.doc
Added archive {newarchive} to http://nlbif.eti.uva.nl/bis/turtles.php?selected=beschrijving&menuentry=groepen&id=36
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/10539_g07n2a5.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images of species for this genus

I have added an image of Psephophorus californiensis based on morphological descriptions from journals. Michael (talk) 20:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]