Talk:Pseudomonas

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HermiaStudy (article contribs). Peer reviewers: C0rckscrews.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lincolnp8.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

The link for reference 5 is not working, but I found the same basic info in another article which you might want to add a reference to: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-microbes-make-snow It is dated Feb. 28, 2008. This is my first Wiki post and so I am reluctant to modify the article myself.Jfodsire (talk) 12:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

I think it would be very helpful to have a less technical section describing this topic for the lay person. This article is not helpful at all to the person wanting a general overview of this topic. My high school students would not find this entry useful at all! SciencePerson (talk) 14:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Generally speaking I think adding a new 'Prevention' section would seem to be appropriate for these types of articles? I have unsuccessfuly looked online to find something on disinfection and prevention methods against this bacteria.AlexGWU (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DO YOU GET THE PSEUDOMONAS ON THE BLOOD ?

The picture shows colonies of Pseudomonas growing on a solid growth media which contains blood. Its not fresh liquid blood, but more like a blood jelly (the jelly is a substance called agar)

Is Pyocyanin also a fluorescent substance?

Yes, its one of the commonly-encountered siderophores which are secreted by the Pseudomonads to scavenge iron. Although its name suggests its a light blue color, the reality is that pyocyanin fluoresces a green colour.

Antibiotic contradiction.

The article states there is a resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, then lists sensitivity to imipenem. Imipenem is in the Carbapenem class - which is a beta-lactam antibiotic.

A Few Questions

I think the list of bacteria formerly classified as Pseudomonads is useful, but the list is getting long. Should a separate page be set up to list the discontinued names? This would serve as a valuable resource to locate the modern designations for old names without cluttering up this page.
Would there be any value in including type collection numbers (e.g. ATCC)?

- I went ahead and put in the type strain numbers.

Taxonomy section

The text in the taxonomy section of this article seems to be identical to an internet blog entry here:

http://www.horizonpress.com/blogger/2007/09/spotlight-on-pseudomonas.html

It cites as a reference a book which isn't going to be published until next year. I don't know if this perhaps constitutes a conflict of interests, but thought I should flag it up. Any thoughts? Pseudomonad 14:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the book is the correct reference/citation and although it has a 2008 date copies are in the bookshops already (I have a copy). The material on the taxonomy section is taken from the book (with the permission of the copyright owner) Touchstone42 09:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I don't think that using this block of text verbatim has integrated well into the existing article though. It touches on issues already addressed in the 'species previously classified as Pseudomonas' section, so maybe some rewriting to combine the two into one section might be in order, I may give this a go if I have time later. Pseudomonad 13:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

minor addition

added mechanical ventillation in addition to CF as group of patients most susceptible to pseudomonas respiratory infections.

82.44.253.212 (talk) 04:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

British or American?

I noticed there are a lot of ", and" and "ize", which is odd as most other microbiology pages are in British English. Can I switch the article over to the Queen's? --Squidonius (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

References are missing for the information describing the unusual places that these bacteria have been found (antiseptics, etc).

92.24.22.195 (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Species previously classified in the genus

δ proteobacteria: P. formicans is linked to Aeromonas cavia, but this belongs to γ proteobacteria. ==>There is an error. Who can corrct? Ernsts (talk) 19:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green urine

According to a YouTube video, a pseudomonas infection can sometimes produce green urine. This was added by someone not logged in and was deleted by someone else, presumably not credible. If someone knows a more credible source, it could make a useful addition to this article. DavidMCEddy (talk) 04:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a reliable source per WP:MEDRS. Jytdog (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Food spoilage other than milk?

@Lincolnp8: I wish to than User:Lincolnp8 for expanding the section on "Food spoilage agents" as requested.

However, I have questions about what was done:

First, citations were deleted regarding the following:

mustiness in eggs: Levine, M; Anderson, DQ (Apr 1932). "Two New Species of Bacteria Causing Mustiness in Eggs". J Bacteriol. 23 (4): 337–47. PMC 533329. PMID 16559557. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help), and
spoilage of cheese, meat, and fish: Gennari, M; Dragotto, F (Apr 1992). "A study of the incidence of different fluorescent Pseudomonas species and biovars in the microflora of fresh and spoiled meat and fish, raw milk, cheese, soil and water". J Appl Bacteriol. 72 (4): 281–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb01836.x. PMID 1517169. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help).

Shouldn't these still be mentioned? Or am I just getting in a hurry, and Lincolnp8 is in the process of making such changes?

If those mentions were deleted for a reason, I hope someone will mention here why they were deleted.

Second, what's PCR? Polymerase chain reaction? I assume this must be it. However, I know very little about this field other that a few books and articles I read that supported changes I made to the article on phage therapy in 2015 and 2016. I will change the first mention of PCR so it says "polymerase chain reaction (PCR)" and links to the article on it. If that is NOT correct, I trust someone will correct this change.

Thanks again, DavidMCEddy (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pseudomonas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080302143557/http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_Bacteria_The_Main_Ingredient_in_Snowflakes_Scientists_Say_14620.html to http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_Bacteria_The_Main_Ingredient_in_Snowflakes_Scientists_Say_14620.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A better picture for pseudomonas?

Does anyone have a better picture of pseudomonas for the article page? As far as I am aware XLD agar is not the selective media of choice for isolating pseudomonas, perhaps a photo of a pure isolate on CLED agar would be better? Sefog (talk) 10:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Reference

The first reference is broken. Dan McCulloch (talk) 00:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]