Talk:Quantum healing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quantum healing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Skepticism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

AlexanderDunlop (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

Discussion Please

Hello all, I would like to initiate a discussion on this topic. I do not think it is fairly portrayed in even the slightest, remotest way. It certainly does not "improve the coverage of alternative medicine." In fact, it debunks this alternative medical approach entirely as "psuedoscience."

How can we have an honest, open dialogue on this topic?

with love, Alexander — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexanderDunlop (talk • contribs) 16:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Any discussion needs to take place within the context of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Two which apply in particular here are WP:MEDRS and WP:FRINGE. In that context I think we do currently have a reasonable neutral article. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 16:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any fair portrayal of "quantum healing" must make it clear that it is pseudoscience. To do otherwise would be dishonest. But the article is as polite as possible about it, and even points out how popular Deepak Chopra is. Maproom (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bullshit. completely biased, dripping with negativity. it's okay to include criticism of a topic in an article but when all the relevant information available in the article revolves around that criticism, the article is useless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.148.39.248 (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What else do you want to see? "People abusing words from physics" is what "quantum healing" is about. --mfb (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"dripping with negativity" well, this a medical topic and people may get hurt, if the information is too positive.--Geysirhead (talk) 08:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]