Talk:Rachel McAdams/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:26, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'll probably start this one in the next few days.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:26, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- General
Resolve the dablink checker results.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
done
"had her eyes set", "on the Hollywood radar" sound unencyclopedic and colloquial
re-worded the latter. However, I could not find the "had her eyes set" in the earlier part on the article. Could you point out what section it is in?
- It was in the 2nd sentence of this version. It has been corrected.
Link York U here not later in the text.
done
take a break when--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
clarified
- Early life
She won a skating award at age 19.Then the text later talks about "An interest in acting sparked when she was child". Please try to be chronological.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
done
students's council is ungrammatical and should probably be linked. One s in "s's" needs to go.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
fixed Crystal Clear x3 06:20, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- Early 2000s
scoring is an unencyclopedic verb choice in this use. Same with "take down"
fixed
Mention what country and network Slings and Arrows is for since we just talked about her transitioning to her first US film
done
Should probably mention Mean Girls is an American film subsequently to keep the reader on board.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)- Done
Ungrammatical: Originally, a then 26 year-old McAdams
done
Almost no facts require more than three sources for verification ([20][21][22][23]). Either work in more detail from the sources to make their relevance clear or trim this down.
fixed
In paragraph 2, you start talking about The Notebook without naming it. It may even deserve its own paragraph, but I can't tell when you stop talking about Mean Girls.
fixed
viewer-voted sounds wrong. People's choice probably sounds better.
done
"remaining her top domestic grossing film at over $209.5 million" needs to be rephrased. It sounds like it was her top hit before she was in it and remained so afterwards.
clarified
- "and is her top domestic " should probably have an {{asof}} in it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done
- 2006–present
287,000 needs units.
done
link New York Post
done
Elaborate on clash
done
Ungrammatical: McAdams found this role to be a departure from previous parts[50] enjoyed doing her own stunts as it is the closest thing she has to playing sports.
fixed --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Doing her own stunts should remain in some form.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done
- Doing her own stunts should remain in some form.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- In the media
link Entertainment Weekly
done
Comma before respectively--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
done
- Did I miss this?
- Personal life
- Do we know what type of Green Card she has?
clarified
- I don't know much about this subject, but I thought there were all kinds of classes of Green Cards. Do you have any more information.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think it's better if I just remove it. Crystal Clear x3 21:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- We should WP:PRESERVE the content, but I was just asking. I am probably making a big deal out of the different categories. There is really one kind of card and recipients might be in any of a number of categories. It would be interesting to know which specific category she is in, but it is not necessary. Keep it even if we have no further detail.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Have I also correctly addressed the other two issues above (her top domestic film and doing her own stunts in Sherlock)? Crystal Clear x3 11:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- We should WP:PRESERVE the content, but I was just asking. I am probably making a big deal out of the different categories. There is really one kind of card and recipients might be in any of a number of categories. It would be interesting to know which specific category she is in, but it is not necessary. Keep it even if we have no further detail.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think it's better if I just remove it. Crystal Clear x3 21:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know much about this subject, but I thought there were all kinds of classes of Green Cards. Do you have any more information.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The phrase "cable connection" sounds foreign to me.
fixed
I'd consider linking environmental awareness, vegetarian and Kensington Market (if it has one).
done
--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
GA checklist
[edit]Probably a GA already. I just need to make a final runthrough and check the images
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- By being so early in her career, this article seems less broad than GAs of other actress, but I think it is fairly complete.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
I have to do an image review- All images need
{{Personality rights}}
tags. - The first two WP:CAPTIONs need to be adjusted. If they are not complete sentences, they should not end in a period.
- All images need
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Done
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Good job. I am pleased to pass this now.