Talk:Radioactive: The Women of Three Mile Island

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

@Donaldd23 removed the notability tag with the edit message "Has multiple reviews (added another one) and award winner. Passes WP:NFILM". I'm not sure I'm convinced. The review added is from Film Threat, which is a site that does paid reviews. Since 2011, those seeking a review from the site can pay between $50 and $400 for varying levels of service, ranging from a "guaranteed review within 7–10 days" to a package that includes a guarantee of "100K minimum impressions". It's not clear to me if paid reviews are disclosed on the review page. If this is a paid review, it certainly does not help establish notability.

The other reviews are:

[1] -- likely WP:SPS
[2] -- possible WP:SPS or otherwise non-RS
[3] -- as indicated at the bottom of the article, this is a press release, not RS
[4] -- self-published/blog, not RS
[5] -- self-published/blog, not RS

So no reviews that are clearly in reliable sources. Overall I am not seeing that this meets WP:FILM. Jfire (talk) 20:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all of the above reviews except for the one on http://theartsstl.com/, which at least purports to have some editorial oversight. Jfire (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jfire, I've added a few of the existing reviews (including the one in Film Threat; but I take notice of what you say about that site) and concur with Donaldd23's assessment. I've also re-removed the tag. I do believe notability is clear here. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mushy Yank, good to see you, and thanks for the sourcing effort. I see that Film Threat is quite widely cited on WP, so I started a thread at RSN to solicit opinions on its reliability in light of the paid review service. Jfire (talk) 01:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]