Talk:Railteam

Europe Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expansion tag is silly

It doesn't make sense to place an expansion tag on this article; Railteam was announced only about two weeks ago and hasn't yet begun joint operations so it makes sense that there is little to say about it at this point. Classifying it as a stub that needs to be expanded is sufficient.--Gloriamarie 23:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passenger Numbers

The article says: "Railteam plans to increase high-speed rail passengers from 15 million a year currently to 25 million by 2010." This implies a stunningly low number of passengers. After all, Eurostar alone already carries 8m passengers a year, which implies that all other services in Europe combined are currently only transporting 2m passengers a hear. Sure this is nonsense, even it is only counting international travellers. Simhedges (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New logo

Can anybody please update the article with the logo of 2010? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hybirdd (talk • contribs) 18:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show us what it looks like? —fudoreaper (talk) 03:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

outdated - website deadlinks

There is reference to 2010 as being in the future and the website provided returns "403 forbidden" - does this article still reflect reality in any way? Hobbitschuster (talk) 13:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Railteam still exists, and to me its members and goals are still the same, so yes it does reflect reality. Slasher-fun (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But 2010 is not in the future any more and the website deadlinks... Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Website is still perfectly fine with me, you may want to check if your DNS are working correctly, I'm restoring the link. Slasher-fun (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, now it works. Don't know what happened. Probably a problem with mobile... Hobbitschuster (talk) 20:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]