Talk:Rajesh Khanna: The Untold Story of India's First Superstar
Rajesh Khanna: The Untold Story of India's First Superstar has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 25, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rajesh Khanna: The Untold Story of India's First Superstar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Yashthepunisher (talk · contribs) 10:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
I'll take this. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Lead
- forty-six-year-long --> 46 year
- Again, please refrain from using words like "highly". They aren't neutral.
- Is well-publicized neutral? --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Synopsis
- "He followed the film with an" Please rephrase the beginning of this sentence.
- Ditto, point two of Lead.
- "The book ends with Khanna's illness." And his death as well right?
Development
- "The book is Yasser Usman's first". Replace 'the book' with the book's name.
- Did Usman interview his daughters?
- I found no sources for these, but I feel he forgot to tell it to the press. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Release
- So you mean the book was first released as a soft copy on Amazon Kindle?
- Yes, I do. Only Amazon that published the book's release date and the earliest one is its release on Amazon Kindle, 5 December 2014. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Critical reception
- Link Advaita Kala
Thats it. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Removed text
[edit]CC-BY-SA; I've removed the following section from the article because it is off-topic for this subject; the article is about a notable book, not about its author. I'm leaving it here in case its removal breaks any named references and for the benefit of future editors. Please see the artile's history for full attribution.
Background
[edit]Yasser Usman was born in the 1980s in Moradabad;[1]:xii[2] his father is reportedly a chemistry professor. In his childhood, Usman had a hobby to read rented popular film magazines and has read many books on Indian film actors.[3] He works as an author, journalist and television producer in Delhi.[2] Usman, who is mostly known as an unauthorised biographer, describes himself as "a keen observer of Bollywood".[4] He wrote in an article published in The Telegraph; "When I set out to write about stars, I wanted the freedom to explore uncomfortable spaces. I wanted to delve not only into their stardom but also their turbulent personal lives and tragic downfalls."[5] In the media, Usman has described as one of the most successful biographers from India. He was noted for his writings that focused on the "dark side" of the country's film industry.[3]
References
- ^ Usman, Yasser (29 August 2016). Rekha: The Untold Story. New Delhi, India: Juggernaut Books. ISBN 978-81-93284-18-6.
- ^ a b Malik, Eekta (10 August 2018). "'I am so tired of goody-goody hagiographies'". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 5 June 2018. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ a b "On Nepotism and Casting 'Ouch' Moments". Juggernaut Books. 3 July 2020. Archived from the original on 26 October 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ Usman, Yasser (25 March 2018). "A life not seen through rose-tinted glasses". The Asian Age. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ Usman, Yasser (11 October 2018). "The curious life of an unauthorised Bollywood biographer". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
No separate editions overseas
[edit]The claim that the book was published in Singapore and Sweden in 2018 was not correct – Amazon may have started selling the (Indian) edition through their local marketplaces then, but that does not mean the book was published in those countries. --bonadea contributions talk 13:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Wait, this time I agree with you. Ok let me change it! --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)