Talk:Red Funnel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Red Funnel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Isle of Wight Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Wight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of the Isle of Wight in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of WightWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of WightTemplate:WikiProject Isle of WightIsle of Wight-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

Can we keep the link in to the 'Petition by Commuters to lower fares' (http://www.competition4iowferries.blogspot.com/). It is public knowledge and highly relevant to the article.

Fair use rationale for Image:Red Funnel.gif

Image:Red Funnel.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isle of White?

I've noticed several references in the 'history' section of this article to an 'Isle of White' and also to a company called 'White Link'...

For anyone not in the know, the island in question is spelt 'Wight' and the company name is similarly different. I have amended this part of the article.

--Peeky44 (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

MV Red Kestrel Entering Southampton. .jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Company names

There has been some to-ing and fro-ing over the correct punctuation for the name "Southampton, Isle of Wight" with or without comma. It is certainly true that company formed in 1861 contained no comma then or now in formal documents (I have added a link to the original Articles of Association in the Esternal links). It is equally true that the comma has, throughout the period, been inserted not only by third parties, but also by the company itself, for example in it's advertisements, presumably because that follows the normal rules of English punctuation that would be expected. The title of the article itself, and the inclusion of the full legal name, follow the clear naming convention for companies, WP:NCCORP. I think that that version should be used consistently in the article, and I have brought one example into line. I am sure that it will come up again, so will add a footnote of explanation.

Secondly, the claim about it being the longest English corporate name needs a citation. There is a curiosity here: the original/current name has 73 letters. But in 1982 it became a PLC[1], so increased to 79. When the company was taken private again in 2000, they deleted not only "public" but also "company"[2], leaving only 66 (I wonder whether their claim was subsequently challenged). It then took them two years to restore the status quo ante[3] with 73 letters. This would be considered OR, but there may be sources out there that cover at least some of this. Davidships (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would PLC, as an abbreviation, be accepted legally or would it be spelt out in full, which would make the name 90 letters long? Just an idle thought. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"PLC" is an abbreviation like "Co. Ltd.", I think. But you have miscounted. Only the six letters of "public" were additional, Davidships (talk) 11:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! definitely overcounted, should have been 79 letters. As for a cite for the claim, the official history of the company, by Keith Adams, makes no mention of it. Neither does an earlier book, by Keith's father. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]