Talk:Reginald Judson/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kges1901 (talk · contribs) 10:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Interesting and well written article.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- Inconsistent ref formatting - some references use harv and others don't. I'd suggest that you change the templates to harv ref for consistency.
- I think you mean the Gustafson ref, have converted to harv. Zawed (talk) 10:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Could you also include a concise mention of the actions that he was awarded the VC for in the lead, as those are the actions that result in his notability? Kges1901 (talk) 10:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Have revised lead. Zawed (talk) 10:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Kges1901: thanks for the review, comments addressed as outlined above. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)