Talk:Regression fallacy

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Is this substantially different from Regression toward the mean? It seems to be the same thing but with less content.62.129.121.63 (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to suggest a merger of the two articles. --KSnortum 20:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Run Amok

Under "Examples", the following sentence

The pain subsiding a little after it has gotten worse is more easily explained by regression towards the mean

does not need citation. It is a simple and obvious conclusion based on the facts of the article and the example given. I call this the citation ad nauseum fallacy. --KSnortum 20:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about a situation where exceptional results have been produced for an extended period? Would it not be reasonable to expect them to continue? There is certainly no logical reason to think that they would end sooner than later simply because they "cannot go on forever". --84.250.188.136 (talk) 01:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]