Talk:Resonance FM

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

POV?

This article runs suspiciously like an ad for the station. I'm not against the level of detail about the schedule (this is useful information) but some of the descriptions could do with re-wording.

eg "Hooting Yard On The Air offers the listener a journey into another world, not very much different from our own, while The Harmon e. Phraisyar Show holds up a mirror to the modern world." - Huh? This is just adverstising puff. --Danward 23:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would somebody have a go at re-writing those portions. It's rather hard to write an impersonal review of some of these shows as they do not have any particular subject matter or theme. --Salimfadhley 17:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about: Long-running shows include "Hooting Yard On the Air", a show written and presented by humorist Frank Key. Each episode offers a connected series of narratives, quotations which blend actual historical events and characters with entirely fictional"

The original version of article was incorrect anyway, the blog is called "Hooting Yard", whereas the radio show is and always has been called "Hooting Yard On The Air". --Salimfadhley 17:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Resfm.gif

Image:Resfm.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that the doctrine of "Fair Use" has any real meaning here - the Resonance Logo is not so much a copyrightable image (e.g. a work of art), but a trademark. "Fair Use" is a legal concept that does not exist in the UK. Using a Resonance mark on an article about Resonance FM is a wholly appropriate use of image. --Salimfadhley 17:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Resonance FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]