Talk:Returnal

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

How do we remove this from the "Playstation 5 Only Games" list?

It's been announced for PC, so it shouldn't be on the list of "Playstation 5 only games" page. 2601:154:C47F:E052:0:0:0:DE (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 13:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Returnal (video game) → Returnal – For the last 3 years, the game has exceeded the album in views by a factor of 10-to-1. It's the obvious primary topic for "Returnal" even if the album is notable. This calls for a hatnote to point to the album, rather than a full disambiguation page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Finland has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Page views make it clear it's the PTOPIC, a hatnote is sufficient. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support In addition to the above , the video game has eight times as many interwikis. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this clearly gets far more traffic and 2010 is recent enough for longterm significance not to to be a factor for the album.--67.70.103.36 (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We should not let short term trends on popular culture dictate topic prevalence, as in five or ten years both could be equally obscure. --Masem (t) 18:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Saving readers a click for the next five to ten years is good UX practice. Until such time that both album and game fall into such obscurity that a primary dab page is warranted, we can rediscuss. Axem Titanium (talk) 09:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The video game is the obvious primary topic. If something changes in the future, we can change the article titles then. Jessintime (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear primary topic. Worrying about five years down the line is crystal ball territory. oknazevad (talk) 07:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.