Jump to content

Talk:Riverfront Times

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Is it just me, or is this article sounding like much of it was cribbed from Riverfront Times promotional material? (from 132.192.91.92)

Yes, it certainly looks that way. Much of the text is in the first person refering to 'our readership' and things like that, and also has the tone of a marketing brocure for the RFT. Someone more knowledgable of the history and such of the RFT should probably rewrite this completely. Meanwhile, I'm marking it with an avert template so it will be flagged as needing cleanup. kenj0418 18:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]