Talk:Rob Sand
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Rob Sand appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Iowa State Auditor Rob Sand (pictured) modeled menswear in Milan and Paris when he was in college? Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that Rob Sand (pictured), a Democratic Party state auditor, developed a government efficiency program that was copied by a Republican? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Emma Dean Powell
- Comment: He's up for reelection on November 8. What's our rule for how many days we consider needed for pre-election embargoes?
5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 17:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC).
Can you please confirm if a 5x expansion has been done here? I'm using DYKcheck here and it says expansion started on March 23, 2021 rather than in August 2022. Otherwise, I didn't find any close paraphrasing and a QPQ has been provided. The original hook is probably the best option here; the Milan part is cited inline and verified, but the Paris part needs a reference. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- And just to clarify the above rule, the "no election candidates on DYK" rule only kicks in 30 days before an election. So as long as the article runs before October that should be fine. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, pre-expansion had 916 bytes. Right now, it's 5196, for 5.67x. On March 23, 2021, someone added some POV content sourced to a tweet that I reverted in the next edit, but it got the page up to 1093 bytes. Since DYKcheck includes that, I'd need to get this up to 5465 bytes, so a couple more sentences. Paris is sourced to the NYT piece that also cites the following sentence in the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- I've edited it up to 5339 characters and DYKcheck approves it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ – Muboshgu (talk) 02:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Per WP:DYK, any sentence that mentions a hook fact needs to have a footnote, even if the information is already cited to a source in a subsequent sentence. The sentence that mentions Paris doesn't have a footnote, and given that the Paris mention is a hook fact, it needs a footnote for DYK purposes. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- I still think that rule is a bit ridiculous given that the source is on the next sentence, but fine, it's double cited now. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Per WP:DYK, any sentence that mentions a hook fact needs to have a footnote, even if the information is already cited to a source in a subsequent sentence. The sentence that mentions Paris doesn't have a footnote, and given that the Paris mention is a hook fact, it needs a footnote for DYK purposes. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- And just to clarify the above rule, the "no election candidates on DYK" rule only kicks in 30 days before an election. So as long as the article runs before October that should be fine. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment (jumping in). I'm not sure that it's quite the best thing to characterize an award ceremony as a
government efficiency program
like is done in the alt hook. If we're going to go with the alt, I'd propose a revision:- Alt 2: ... that Democrat Rob Sand (pictured), the Iowa State Auditor, developed an awards program for fiscally efficiency in government that was later copied by a Mississippi Republican? Source: <https://www.vicksburgpost.com/2022/02/02/guest-column-new-award-honors-good-efficient-government/>
- — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
We're probably good to go with the original hook here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Iowa articles
- Mid-importance Iowa articles
- WikiProject Iowa articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles