Jump to content

Talk:Roland (The X-Files)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Dr. Blofeld 17:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

"Mulder finds four sets of handwriting on the whiteboard" Sets? Would pieces make more sense?

  • The discussion ends when Roland experiences a violent vision and they leave. Seems an odd time to leave if he has a dramatic outburst. Can you elaborate a little what the violent vision was? You then mention he had another predicting a death.
    Fixed the vision thing. The whiteboard bit is one of those stereotypical huge equation things and Mulder concludes that there's four unique samples of handwriting amongst the whole jumble. I'm not sure if either "sets" or "pieces" really work so I'll rephrase it a bit.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

On second thoughts sets looks OK.. Good enough to pass. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]