This article was nominated for deletion on 18 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Religion: New religious movements Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

This article has no references at all. It is in violation of the arbitration rulings concerning anthroposophy-related articles and has been so for months. If adequate, non-anthroposophical sources are not cited in the next week or so, I will propose it for deletion.DianaW 14:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, in this case the article itself was established *after* the arbitration. There is no excuse for creating more articles when you are also telling us it will take "months" to clean up the ones that were already here.DianaW 14:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the above should read that it has only anthroposophical references.DianaW 14:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All references are to third-party published sources, in accordance with the most rigorous standard of the arbitration criteria; however, according to the arbitration proceedings, anthroposophic sources may be used for non-controversial material. Particular exercises could thus be sourced to such material, though they have not been hitherto. Hgilbert (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite clear that this article is merely informing the reader of a particularly bulk element of Steiner's philosophy. Thus, it is also quite clear that such can not be controversial. The listed sources are adequate for the communication of a philosopher's perspective. In presence or absence of wiki-politics (which I respect), it would be outrageous to simply remove this content. 04:19, 19 August 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.59.43.96 (talk)

Exercises

The word "exercises" might be misleading for the six supplementary practices, but this is the usual term employed (a translation of the word Nebenübungen). Clean Copy^talk 16:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]