Talk:Russian cruiser Rossia/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
You've got a mixture of AE and BE (i.e., "calibre" but "armor")- Think I caught them all.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
Do we know what the cruising speed on just the central shaft is? Is it the 10kn mentioned in her range? If so, this could be made clearer.Navweaps has information on torpedoes that might be used to flesh out the last bit in the armament section. But, if you don't know the model carried on the ship that's fine too. I've had that problem before.- Good idea, done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- What about the speed for the cruising engine? Parsecboy (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Not specified in my sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing more you can do then. Parsecboy (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Not specified in my sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- What about the speed for the cruising engine? Parsecboy (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea, done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- The first two images don't appear to have a date of publication, so we can't determine whether they're PD or not. The images you uploaded are fine.
- Replaced with fair-use images.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Should be ok now. Parsecboy (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Replaced with fair-use images.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- The first two images don't appear to have a date of publication, so we can't determine whether they're PD or not. The images you uploaded are fine.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Everything else looks pretty good, excellent work! Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)