Talk:Russian monitor Perun
Appearance
![]() | Russian monitor Perun has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 27, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian monitor Perun/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 12:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 12:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- The article is thoroughly referenced. It relies heavily on a single source, but there doesn't seem to be much information available in English on this ship so that's no problem.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Looks like you've covered the available information comprehensively. The infobox mentions the namesake of the ship, but if you want to improve the article further you could include a sentence explaining the namesake in the body.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I searched the Russian name of the ship to try to find an image of the ship itself, but couldn't. The image of Koldun is definitely better than nothing.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Thanks for your work on this article, it looks great and I'm happy to close the review as pass and promote to GA. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Heh - I was just about to post my review of the article when you beat me to the punch - hope you don't mind if I add my comments.
- Would the rectangular boilers be box boilers?
- Probably, but let me query my boiler expert.
- Link ironclad, wrought iron, and I'd assume the shipyard merits a red link
- Linked, except for the shipyard as I'm not sure what happens to it later on. I suspect that it gets absorbed by the New Admiralty, but maybe not.
- this has a bit of back story on the name - don't know if it's worth including in a footnote or not - nothing else of any note in google books. Parsecboy (talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding your comments; I linked to the namesake in the infobox and I think that that's good enough.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance GA-Class Russia articles
- GA-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
- Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
- GA-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages