Talk:SMS Zara/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 08:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in good shape. A few comments:

No dabs or duplicate links
categorisation seems sensible
suggest pointing out that the guns were muzzle-loaders if that was the case
- Breech-loaders, in this case
the guns in the body and infobox don't match, they are 9 cm in the body and 87 mm in the infobox, and 7cm in the body and 66 mm in the infobox
- Yeah, those arrived here and I forgot to go back and fix them.
STT is mentioned without saying who they were or linking
- Ah yes, I had intended to mention the engines were manufactured by STT in the design section, but then forgot to actually do that.
please check the speed trial info in the body (both parts) and infobox, they don't appear to match
- Both are 14.29, but I did notice that the service max speed was missing from the body.
did the proposed screw replacement go ahead?
- Yeah, I tweaked it a bit to make it clearer - see if that works.
link ship commissioning
- Done
suggest linking roll to Ship motions
- Good idea
suggest linking reconnaissance
- Done
"In Pola, a commissioned"
- Fixed
the image licensing needs work, shouldn't it be PD-because?
- Yeah, you're right - fixed

Otherwise, I'm done. Placing on hold. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another review. Parsecboy (talk) 11:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an appropriately licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]