Talk:Sagar Island

India: West Bengal / Geography Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Sagar CD Block

Does Sagar CD Block, as listed in this page, include Sagar Island? Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Area of Sagar Island

The area is mentioned as 334 sq M. I think it's about 224.3 sq km. Please rectify. 223.223.155.211 (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if it has a population of over 200,000, then obviously its area has to be more than what 334 or (as it shows in the infobox) 340 square meters, as that isn't even twice as much livable area as I have in my house. So that number is wrong, and I'm going to remove it now. But not replace it: We'd need a reliable source (not "I think"!) for the correct number. Can you supply one? Largoplazo (talk) 16:15, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]