A fact from Samuel Goldwyn Estate appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I like ALT1 better since for ALT0 as stated in the article he didn't walk all the way to work and Samuel Goldwyn Estate → walked to work every day seems a bit of a stretch. ALT1 is hookier and raises the great possibility of adding a picture of Hepburn. I also liked the Lucille Ball artichoke story! Can you clarify please the page number? I could check the reference for Hepburn, it's good but googlebooks gives an ebook with no page numbers, here it says page 256, on the article it says page 247. Could also give her direct quote instead of paraphrasing since the two "one's" are slightly awkward, what do you think? Below some image suggestions. Mujinga (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - I've fixed the Kate ref, it's frustrating with Google Books and page numbers sometimes. There are so many more anecdotes I could have included! I've reproduced her quote as well. The Woman of the Year picture is more authoritative, I think. Thanks for your great suggestions. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK cool, this is now ready to go except for the pic, if you do want to use a pic it needs to be in the article and then I can review it to check it is suitably licensed Mujinga (talk) 21:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]