Talk:Sand Point Light

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lighthouses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this light functioning

The sources seem to be somewhat in conflict. Wobser says it was relit in 1989. I know the standard is verifiablility (sources) not truth. But I want to get this right. Anybody know? 7&6=thirteen (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name change needed

This article needs a name change to Sand Point (Escanaba), I think. Or Escanaba/Sand Point (Little Bay de Noc) Light. as the ARLHS calls it. There is another Sand Point Light in Michigan at Baraga, which article does not yet exist. See Lighthouse Digest. Note the template is wrong, and the List of Michigan lighthouses (US lights) links to the wrong article. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

I've added this light to the Sand Point dab page..if it does change names or the other article gets created then the dab page will need updated.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 21:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason the NHRP list has this as the "Sand Lighthouse", which I haven't seen anywhere else. The state of Michigan's historic sign next to the lighthouse (I have a photo I can upload) uses Sand Point Lighthouse, which seems to be the most common version. We can always include variants in the first sentence. My concern was just making sure everything is linked together. The previous version had "Light", which wasn't used by either listing. In either case, I think using just "Sand Point" would be incomplete. --Bobak (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Coast Guard, Terry Pepper, Michigan Lighthouse Conservancy, Lighthouse Depot, Lighthouse Digest, and ARLHS (link is at Lighthouse Digest) are not uniform. If you click on the external links you can find this. It should either be "Sand Point Light" or "Sand Point Lighthouse". I don't have a position between the two, but agree that "Sand Point" alone isn't quite right. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

I went ahead and placed it at "Sand Point Light", as per longstanding tradition, "Lighthouse" is incorrect. It can be moved to a better place once a name is decided on for the other page. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sand Point Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]