Jump to content

Talk:Savaric FitzGeldewin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSavaric FitzGeldewin has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Savaric FitzGeldewin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 13:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    No images
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    No images
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]