Talk:Scottish art/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]- File:Cadell, The Vase of Water.jpg needs a US copyright tag
- Aside from that one detail, I think this is meets GA criteria. For it to pass FA, it will probably need more development of the sculpture, decorative objects, textiles and other non-painting forms of art. This is a great overview - your work on Scotland is truly impressive. Thank you! - Lemurbaby (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- I have fixed that one issue. Many thanks for a rapid review. Much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)