Talk:Script (comics)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Marvel Method page were merged into Script (comics) on February 5, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
,
Untitled
[edit]I deleted all initial text, because it described comics as opposed to scripts. 82.92.181.129 13:46, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to merge. NukeofEarl (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
I propose that Marvel Method be merged into Script (comics). The content of Marvel Method is already covered in this article, and editors improving the Marvel Method article have to waste time duplicating their work here. Seems like a clear case of WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Also, it gives undue weight to the Marvel Method, since we of course do not have a corresponding separate article for the full script method.--NukeofEarl (talk) 15:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Alright, over a week has passed with no objections, so I'll close this discussion and perform the merge.--NukeofEarl (talk) 16:39, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Co-plot credit
[edit]I've removed the sentence about artists being given co-plot credit during the 1970s, because the example given is inaccurate. Claremont and Byrne actually did formulate plots together in story discussions during that period, so Byrne's getting co-plot credit has nothing to do with their using the Marvel Method. While it wouldn't surprise me to learn that there are artists who got co-plot credit simply because they were using the Marvel Method, I don't know of any examples that I can back up with sources. Even if I did, that wouldn't prove that this practice became commonplace during the 1970s. So if anyone has good referenced information about this practice, please put it up!--NukeofEarl (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)