Talk:Sertorian War
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Sertorian War be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
It is requested that an image or photograph of Sertorian War be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Portugal may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
It is requested that an image or photograph of Sertorian War be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Spain may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Spaniards?[edit]
I'm pretty sure there where no Spaniards back then. Spain and Portugal only came several centuries later. "Celtiberian tribes" would be more correct, but I'm not sure. I am pretty sure "Spaniards" is definitely incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.99.55 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Sertorius was backed by both Lusitanians and Celtiberians -Hispanics perhaps?Dejvid (talk) 18:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Neither Hispanics nor Spaniards. Celtiberians is the best term to use.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- It was the Lusitanians who initially invited Sertorius to Hispania. Celtiberian support only came later. A term is needed that covers both groups. Hence Cetliberian is in correct except in cases where Celtiberians were exclusively involved.Dejvid (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- I also think that saying Spaniards does not make sense in the context. Hispani would be the proper term.--Xareu bs (talk) 08:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Most historians seem happy with Spaniards but I would not object to Hispanics or Hispani. It does seem to to be a little jargonish so I myself don't intend to make such a change.Dejvid (talk) 17:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
- Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
- B-Class Spanish military history articles
- Spanish military history task force articles
- B-Class Classical warfare articles
- Classical warfare task force articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- B-Class Portugal articles
- Unknown-importance Portugal articles
- WikiProject Portugal articles
- B-Class Spain articles
- Unknown-importance Spain articles
- All WikiProject Spain pages
- Wikipedia requested images of military history
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Portugal
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Spain