Talk:Seven Mountain Mandate

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Movement or concept?

I don't think this constitutes a movement as much as an idea/concept - possibly a theology.

Is there some kind of test for whether something is a movement or not? eg. that its followers identify with it in an affiliatory sense, rather than just as a model/way of thinking? 194.223.4.117 (talk) 04:46, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know (that is, I literally do not know, not "I'm dubious of") whether it has enough of a distinctive intellectual apparatus to have been regarded by disinterested scholars and academics as a theology independent of dominionism, but I take your point about whether strictly speaking it's a "movement". Perhaps a mission, in the Christian sense. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s actively reconstructing the way the country functions via multiple groups it contributes to.These groups legally challenge long accepted law via the courts and when these cases await a SCOTUS approval for argument They are Always accepted.

Minority rule is not beneficial for the country or the future. It undermines law, equality, choice and it’s actions are already causing harm.

They fund the Federalist Society. This is where 6 of the SCOTUS came from.

The supreme court has already made smaller rulings to create legal precedent such as allowing PUBLIC funds for a Christian private school. The state refused to fund the religious school in Vermont or New Hampshire.The court isn’t returning individual state power when it ruled against the state.

Another ruling that corporations can cast local votes in Seaview, NY. That is a right reserved for citizens.

What about bigger cases such as

Dobbs, chevron?

This group influences the decisions of 6/9 justices.

The election WILL be contested and this court will decide.

It isn't justice or law that matters currently. Only who pulls the strings. Trump received a million dollars for his campaign each time he selected a candidate for SCOTUS. These people will run the lives OF 350 million Americans via Donald.

Clarence Thomas has been collecting millions in “gifts” and will not recuse himself from cases involving the gift givers.

Samuel Alito is extremely close with the Hobby Lobby owners.

This is an theocratic oligarchy in its mid stages. Members MUST have a net worth of 25 million to join. this where project 2025 policies originated.

I realize it seems like lunacy, so check these names, cases and actions made by its individual subgroups. This Christian organization is extremist about other people. They are exempt from following their own mandates. Their justification is a few wealthy people have been selected by god to determine lifestyle, art and entertainment, education, law, and science and technology. It’s Iran with Christian extremism. 2600:1000:A121:775C:1D16:6BEA:631:3E6A (talk) 20:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information lacking

Basic information that is lacking from the current version of this article: how exactly followers of the Seven Mountain Mandate would change public policy in the realms of family, religion, education, media, entertainment, business, and government. That's a pretty serious thing to leave out of an article such as this, if we aim to treat subjects in encyclopedic manner at Wikipedia. 76.190.213.189 (talk) 00:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This started way before 1975. It goes even further than 1948 British-Israelism. It goes back further than Lucis Trust, British-Israelism, Helena Blavatsky, Alice Bailey, Aleister Crowley and the Latter Rain Movement. It goes further back than Jane Lead. It goes further back than Valentinus. There is much more information missing. 2603:6011:A202:E19D:5979:1087:2582:E20A (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. This specifically started in the 1970s due to the influence of right wing conservatives that opposed desegregation in 1954. It wasn't until the 1970s that this movement had enough money, influence, and impetus to make changes. Most of the things you reference have nothing at all to do with this. Viriditas (talk) 19:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]