Talk:Shaitan Singh
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shaitan Singh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Shaitan Singh has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 19, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Shaitan Singh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 March 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Shaitan Singh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Force Radical (talk · contribs) 09:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
I will be taking on this review. As this is a short article it probably won't take too much time. If I don't respond within 3 days I may have forgotten about this review. If such a situation arises please ping me here or leave a message on my talkpage.Thanks — Force Radical∞ ( Talk ⋯ Contribs ) 09:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Note:-This review may be used by Force Radical gain points for the ongoing Wikicup competition — Force Radical∞ ( Talk ⋯ Contribs ) 09:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga-As of 16 January 2018 certain problems have been found with Shaitan Singh which must be resolved by the nominator before before it can be promoted to Good Article status: Lede[edit]
Early Life[edit]
Sino Indian War[edit]
Please provide reliable sources to back these claims up.[I am not an expert and may not be well informed]
Battle of Rezang La[edit]
Param Vir Chakra[edit]
On the whole I would say that this article is well sourced and written in most sections, however the Sino-Indian war section was a let down as it sounded overtly anti-civilian and aggressive towards the Chinese. I will be placing the article On hold for 168 hours and will later add a summary (one of those templates) to this page in accordance with the formal GA criterion. Please ping me if you finish the work before the mandatory 168 hours holding period. Thanks. — Force Radical∞ ( Talk ⋯ Contribs ) 12:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC) |
Summary before improvements
[edit]This article has been put On hold pending improvments for its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of January 19, 2018, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Pass (Worked on during review)
- 2. Verifiable?: Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable?: Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
Detailed comments are provided above. Thank you for your work so far. — Force Radical∞ ( Talk ⋯ Contribs ) 12:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Force Radical: Thanks for the review. I have addressed your comments, please have a look. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Indian military history articles
- Indian military history task force articles
- GA-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles