Talk:Shettles method

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Y-chromsome-carrying (male) sperm stronger and faster?

That needs substantiation or removal. What /is/ true is that sperm carrying a Y chromosome will have slightly less mass than one carrying an X chromosome (and so will quite possibly be able to go slightly faster) - but that doesn't make the sperm stronger. It's also debateable as to how much influence such a small difference could have. Lupine nickt 12:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

only one source and it is contradictory?

While google brings up 24,000 hits, I am still curious. We need some more sources than just one that contradicts it. --Ķĩřβȳ ♥Ťįɱé Ø 21:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rewritten.

I've rewritten the article as well as removing the stub and non-objective tags. One or the other might still be appropriate and I leave it up to other Wikipedians to make that decision.Eljamin 17:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discredited

the article on Sex selection cites studies that show no correlation