Talk:Sno-Jet
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Jim adema.jpg
[edit]Image:Jim adema.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Spelling of company name
[edit]Prior to my cleanup of this article, there were several references to Snow*Jet with an asterisk rather than a hyphen—due, I assume, to the company's logo, which has a small star design between Sno and Jet (see example here). I felt consistency was paramount; but if Sno*Jet is the official spelling, please change it here. (Can the article's name be changed that way, too? I have no idea.) Cheers! – AndyFielding (talk) 05:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Mostly sourced to one person
[edit]It looks like the entire article here was sourced to someone's personal website, listed in the external links. While it does look informative it isn't necessarily reliable. Don't know how to properly tag this so I've chalked it up to an original research tag. Found some miscellaneous references on a couple historical facts that could be used though. Reconrabbit 19:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)