Jump to content

Talk:Social Democratic Party of India

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Invalid Reference

[edit]

The reference no:2 is now invalid. I think that should be removed.--Rameshng (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rameshng, Thanks for pointing out. I had fixed the issue. But some user removed all my edits for no reason. I have no idea why the user:Debresser deleted the contents. -- Indiashines (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General cleanup of the entire article. April 2014.

[edit]

I have tried to retain all content. Keep all citations and tag them appropriately. Remove unnecessary duplication. Added some content from existing source to balance the discussion where only selected parts of the text is reproduced to give incomplete picture. Will try to transform all online reference appropriately to save them from link rot. Jyoti (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, updated 9 bare urls into proper references. Also time stamped other tags and changed the layout consistently. --Jyoti (talk) 07:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this to reliable source board if needed, the statement is balanced.

[edit]

Hi User:Huhshyeh, I think New Indian Express is a regular news paper. I am not aware, but if you can point me to a Wikipedia discussion where it has been discarded as unreliable source and discouraged from use it will be helpful. We cannot rely on an contributor's personal view. Besides I find it fairly balanced. Till then please do not discard this thisstatement claiming the source is not worthy. Jyoti (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

This edit is a copyvio from here. --AmritasyaPutraT 12:15, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That editor is going on a rampage I guess! --AmritasyaPutraT 12:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it certainly appears to be. They've been reverted for now, but let's keep an eye out. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Table for General election

[edit]

The label extremeist is Unsourced. The election result is already covered in prose. Explain the need for table in the talk page Venkat TL (talk) 11:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained on my talk page, The WP:LABEL "Extremist" that I re-added after your edit was because of an edit conflict. I did not intend to add that back in the article. >>> Extorc.talk(); 12:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, please make sure to recheck after making edits if you get edit conflict. Venkat TL (talk) 12:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, Thanks. >>> Extorc.talk(); 12:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]