Talk:SolidFire
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SolidFire redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 October 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page name
[edit]I just added a reference to the infobox for this company and noticed that the article refers to it as SolidFire. I checked the other refs, including Forbes and VentureBeat, and they write it that way too. I'm moving the article to that name as I believe Solidfire is a typo. IdlePlayground (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class United States articles
- NA-importance United States articles
- Redirect-Class United States articles of NA-importance
- Redirect-Class Colorado articles
- NA-importance Colorado articles
- WikiProject Colorado articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Redirect-Class company articles
- NA-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles