Jump to content

Talk:Solomon Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSolomon Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 15, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Solomon Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 11:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

review

MathewTownsend (talk) 14:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That should be everything. I additionally revised a note saying that Guadalcanal was the main Solomon Island (even though it has the capital, it is not the most populous island, so to say that may have been POV on my part), in case you checked back and noticed the extra copyedit I made. Thanks for reviewing the article, and I'm glad you enjoyed reading it. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
    b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
    b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    c. no original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    no edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]