Talk:Something There/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Luthien22 (talk · contribs) 21:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review another article nominated by @ChangedfortheBetter:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
As always, excellent.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
No issues.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
There is a hefty references section.

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Excellent references. No use of blogs, and many uses of academic sources and books. I'm surprised you were able to find this many good sources.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Covers almost every aspect of the song, including composition, performance, and reception. This article could probably benefit from a little bit more coverage on its use in the Broadway production, but since it's not a major part of that show, the current coverage is perfectly fine if you can't find anything more.

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Very stable. As always for Disney articles, I recommend staying extra alert for possible vandalism or non encyclopedic good faith edits, as these articles are more prone to attract that.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
As on the last GA I conducted on a song article, I also counted sound files under this category. Both files, the image and the sound file, are properly licensed.

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
The one image provided is sufficient, and the 20 second sound file is also sufficient.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This was an easy article to pass. Nice job, all editors.

Woooowwww well that was quick and painless, lol. Thank you so much!!!--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]