Talk:Son of God (TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Son of God (TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Son of God (TV series) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 23, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
January 8, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 8, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a study conducted by the BBC series Son of God concluded that the skin of Jesus Christ would have been "olive-coloured" and "swarthy"?

Current status: Good article

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Christianity: Jesus Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Son of God (TV series)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 03:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: mone found. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It was first broadcast in the United Kingdom on 1 April 2001, yet Son of God ran for a single series of three episodes, Please make it clear that it was the first episide which was broadcast on 1 April
Done.

others remarked that it was dumbed down went off on some strange tangents. misdsing "and"?
Added.

and was executively produced by Ruth Pitt, "and the executive produder was Ruth Pitt" is better
Replaced.

Despite not being religious, he was drawn to programme for its use of scientific and historical information. missing definite article.
Added.

The completed programme ultimately featured more than an hour and a half of Whitbourn's music "ultimately" is uneccessary here
Removed.

who employed techniques similar to ones used in the recent BBC series Walking with Dinosaurs. recent is a potentially dated term, give a date.
Done.

astrologers from around time of Herod the Great would have believed that the constellation Aries would have symbolised his kingdom and the lands that he controlled missing definite article
Added.

where Jesus is traditionally was to have spent 40 days and nights being tempted by the devil. ?? ungrammatical
Rewritten.

a retired medical artist from the Unit of Art in Medicine at the University of Manchester Why the capitalization?
Removed.
Actually, I now see that is the name of a department so I have recapitalized. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reaction to Son of God was mixed. The series received praise from commentators such as Andrew Billen of New Statesman missing definite article
Where? The magazine's official title is "New Statesman" rather than "The New Stateman".
Indeed it is, but I meant "of the New Statesman" I have copy-edited to this effect. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was repeated during March the following year, and gained a figure of 1.5 million viewers per episode. Was this in the US or the UK?
Added.

The series was nominated for two awards, both for the computer-generated images created by graphics team Red Vision. The show received a nomination at the 2001 LEAF Awards, and won an Outstanding Achievement award at the 2001 Royal Television Society North Awards. Were the two awards the LEAF and RTSN? It is not clear in the way it is currently phrased.
Rewritten.

It was also repeated on Christmas Day 2002 and 2003. Where - UK or US?
Added.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Spotchecks show statements are supported by sources, sources appear RS, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Sufficient detail without uneccessary trivia
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two images have correct license or NFUR and vaptions, but File:Race of Jesus.ogv has contradictory information in the NFUR. An 18-second video sample from episode two of the BBC history series Son of God. and Extracted from episode three of Son of God Needs sorting out.
Done.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On Hold for seven days for issues above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, good to go. I am happy to list this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review, Jezhotwells! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 17:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Son of God (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207183841/http://lass.calumet.purdue.edu/cca/gmj/fa07/gmj-fa07-selznick.htm to http://lass.calumet.purdue.edu/cca/gmj/fa07/gmj-fa07-selznick.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/sog/%7D%7D

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish skulls

Joe Zias has found that Jewish braincases are much more robust than non-Jewish ones. תיל"ם (talk) 03:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]